Millions of people saw the recent viral “wardrobe malfunction” video appearing to show BLACKPINK’s Jennie exposed — and a large number of viewers could be looking at criminal charges.
The 2026 Summer Sonic clip in question divided the internet last week after some fans argued that the video showed a genuine “nip slip,” while others alleged that the footage was misleading and may have been edited using AI.
OA Entertainment Takes Swift Action
In just half a day, the video spread rapidly across social media, racking up 12.5 million views. Days later, Jennie’s agency OA Entertainment issued a stern statement of legal action against those found “maliciously editing or re-processing the artist’s physical features” as well as “distributing specific photos or video clips.” This strong stance underscores the K-Pop industry’s commitment to protecting its artists from exploitation and defamation.
Severe Legal Consequences Loom for Fans
Now, Korean outlet Law Talk News reports that anyone who shared the “explicit video” could face serious punishment, whether the footage is real or not. This broad interpretation of liability highlights the strictness of South Korean defamation and obscenity laws, which are designed to protect individuals, especially public figures, from harmful online content.
The Original Poster’s Fate
[The original poster] could be punished under Article 14 of the Act on Special Cases Concerning the Punishment of Sexual Crimes for filming or distributing the material against the victim’s will, carrying a penalty of up to seven years in prison or a fine of up to ₩50.0 million KRW (about $35,900 USD).
— Law Talk News
If the perpetrator were found to have posted the video for profit or to farm views, they could face an “enhanced sentence of at least three years’ imprisonment.” This penalty reflects the severe view authorities take on those who intentionally profit from or distribute harmful, sexually suggestive material involving others without consent.
Resharing and Even Viewing Is Risky

Meanwhile, even those who simply reshared the video through messaging apps and online communities face the same maximum seven-year sentence as the original poster, and people who saved the video for personal viewing without sharing it aren’t in the clear either. This broad sweep of potential charges means that even passive participation in the video’s circulation carries significant legal risks, a stark warning to anyone consuming or distributing such content.
Don’t Just Comment: The Dangers of Online Remarks
The law provides that simply viewing, storing, or possessing false video content can be punished by up to three years in prison or a fine of up to ₩30.0 million KRW (about $21,500 USD)… If the video remains on a person’s smartphone or computer at this very moment, that person could be considered to be committing the offense continuously in real time.
— Law Talk News
And if those who only commented on the video think they’re safe, they can think again, according to legal journalist Son Soo Hyung. Mocking the video or leaving comments that “cause sexual humiliation” could lead to up to two years in prison or a fine of up to ₩20.0 million KRW (about $14,400 USD). This emphasizes that online comments are not consequence-free and can be considered active participation in defamation or harassment under South Korean law.
“Just Curious” Won’t Cut It

What if someone claims they only clicked the video out of curiosity? According to Son Soo Hyung, excuses like these are unlikely to hold up under scrutiny from investigators. In its notice, OA Entertainment stated that it is already “collecting evidence” and “actively pursuing civil and criminal legal complaints.” This firm commitment from the agency means that investigations will be thorough, and passive excuses may not be enough to avoid legal repercussions for those involved.



